Redesign

Website redesign, and whether you need one.

A surprising number of sites that feel tired do not need rebuilding. They need current content, a tidier front end and someone to fix the three things that have been annoying everyone for a year.

Rankings protected Rebuild only if needed Phased where sensible
First question

Is it the design, or the content?

The feeling that a site is dated is usually accurate, but the cause is often not the design. It is copy describing what the business did four years ago, photography from the old premises, services that have changed, and a structure that grew by accretion. A redesign fixes none of that if the content comes across unchanged.

The other common cause is accumulated workaround — a dozen plugins added over time, each solving a problem, together making the site slow and fragile. That is a real reason to rebuild, and it is a different reason from how it looks.

So the useful first step is separating the three: content that is out of date, a design that has aged, and a foundation that is actively in the way. They have different costs, and only the third genuinely requires starting again.

Able Web Services Ltd.UK web development
200+PROJECTS DELIVERED
140+CLIENTS SUPPORTED
15+YEARS ESTABLISHED
UKBASED & HOSTED

What we do

  • Bespoke websites and custom CMS development
  • Ecommerce, custom checkout and subscriptions
  • Web applications, portals and internal tools
  • API, CRM and business systems integration
  • Retained support, maintenance and managed hosting
  • White-label development for agencies

Working UK-wide and internationally — directly with businesses, and white label behind design and marketing agencies.

Discuss a project
How we approach it

What a redesign should involve.

Find out what works now

Which pages bring traffic and enquiries. Redesigns routinely remove the page that was quietly doing all the work because nobody checked first.

Keep the URLs

Every address either stays or redirects permanently. This is the single most common way a redesign loses traffic, and it is entirely avoidable.

Fix the structure

Usually more valuable than the visual work. A site people can navigate converts better than one that merely looks newer.

Content first, not last

Content is the thing that delays redesigns. Starting it early is the single biggest influence on whether the project lands on time.

Build for editing

So the new site does not age the same way. If every change needs a developer, you will be here again in three years.

Watch it afterwards

Crawl errors and rankings monitored for weeks after launch, because that is when problems surface.

Straight answers

When we would say do not.

When the content is the problem

New content on the existing site is a fraction of the cost and often achieves what you actually wanted.

When it is working

A plain site that generates enquiries is doing its job. Redesigning because it is unfashionable is an expensive way to risk something that works.

When nothing will change afterwards

If no one will own the content after launch, a redesign buys you two good years and the same problem again.

Related services

The wider picture.

Related work

Projects of a similar shape.

A lot of our work is delivered white label or under agreement, so these describe the problem and the approach rather than naming the client.

Related

Also worth reading.

Questions

What people ask about redesigns.

Will we lose our Google rankings?
Not if URLs are handled properly. Every existing address needs to stay or redirect permanently, and the pages that currently earn traffic need identifying before anything is removed. Done carelessly this is exactly where redesigns lose traffic, and it is hard to recover afterwards.
How long does a redesign take?
Usually a few months, and the bottleneck is almost always content rather than build. If you can have the copy and photography ready, it moves considerably faster.
Can we keep our existing CMS?
Often, and it saves money and retraining. We would only recommend changing platform if the current one actively prevents what you need next.
Should we change everything at once?
Rarely. Changing design, platform, content and structure simultaneously makes it impossible to tell what caused a drop if one happens. Phasing is usually safer.
Next step

Send us the site and we will tell you what it actually needs.

Including when that is new content on the site you already have, which is cheaper for you and smaller work for us. We would rather be right.